Territori e nuove forme di innovazione sociale. Verso un Social Impact Bond a Terni?

Autori

  • Davide Emanuele Iannace CNR-IRCRES & Università di Roma La Sapienza
  • Giorgia Panico Università degli Studi del Salento
  • Alessia Virga CIHEAM Bari
  • Vassia Fragkaki Università degli Studi Roma Tre

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15162/2240-760X/2322

Parole chiave:

Innovazione sociale, sviluppo sostenibile, finanzia sociale, Social Impact Bond (SIB), Terni, social innovation, sustainable development, social finance

Abstract

Terni, città dalla forte eredità industriale, è oggi attraversata da profonde criticità ambientali e sanitarie, che rendono necessarie risposte strutturate basate su modelli di governance intersettoriale e partenariati stabili tra attori pubblici, privati e del Terzo settore. Partendo da una rassegna della letteratura sullo sviluppo sostenibile, l’innovazione sociale e la finanza a impatto, il contributo propone il territorio ternano come contesto privilegiato per sperimentare l’adozione di un Social Impact Bond (SIB) in ambito sanitario, con particolare attenzione alla dimensione della prevenzione. Si analizzano l’architettura dello strumento, il ruolo degli attori locali da coinvolgere, ipotizzando i principali indicatori di esito. Si discutono, infine, potenzialità – quali la mobilitazione di capitali privati, la riduzione della pressione sul sistema ospedaliero e una gestione più efficiente delle risorse pubbliche – e criticità del dispositivo, offrendo spunti operativi per una sua possibile implementazione.

 

Terni, a city with a long-standing industrial legacy, is currently facing severe environmental and public health challenges that demand structured responses grounded in intersectoral governance and stable partnerships among public, private, and third-sector actors. Drawing on the literature on sustainable development, social innovation, and impact finance, this research identifies the territory of Terni as a suitable laboratory for the experimentation of a Social Impact Bond (SIB) in the health domain, with a particular focus on prevention. The analysis explores the instrument’s design, the role of the local actors to be involved, and sets out the main outcome indicators. It further discusses both the opportunities – such as the mobilization of private capital, the reduction of pressure on the hospital system, and a more efficient allocation of public resources – and the limitations of the mechanism, offering operational insights for its potential implementation.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Albertson K., Fox C., O’Leary C. e Painter G. (2020). Towards a theoretical framework for social impact bonds, Nonprofit Policy Forum, 11 (2). https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2019-0056.

Barbera F. (2020). L’innovazione sociale: aspetti concettuali, problemi metodologici e implicazioni per l’agenda della ricerca, Polis, 35 (1), pp. 131-148. doi/10.1424/96443.

Bauleo L., Fabri A., De Santis M., Soggiu M. E. e Ancona C. (2023). Valutazione dell’impatto dell’inquinamento atmosferico sulla salute della popolazione residente nelle aree industriali italiane incluse nel Progetto SENTIERI Epidemiologia & Prevenzione, 47 (1-2), pp. 338-353. https://doi.org/10.19191/EP23.1-2-S1.007.

Bottazzi G. (2007). Sviluppo e sottosviluppo: Idee, teorie, speranze e delusioni, Cagliari: Aisara.

Broccardo E., e Mazzuca M. (2019). The missing link? Finance, public services, and co-production: The case of social impact bonds (SIBs), Public Money & Management, 39 (4), pp. 262-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1592907.

Broccardo E., Mazzuca M. e Frigotto M. L. (2020). Social impact bonds: The evolution of research and a review of the academic literature, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27 (3), pp. 1316-1332. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/csr.1886.

Caudo G., Baioni M. e Piselli E. (2020). Focus di ricerca sulla direttrice Terni-Roma. (https://labic.it/focus-di-ricerca-direttrice-terni-roma/).

Chamaki F. N., Jenkins G. P. e Hashemi M. (2018). Social Impact Bonds: Implementation, Evaluation, and Monitoring, International Journal of Public Administration, 42 (4), pp. 289-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1433206.

Ciccone S. (2023). La dimensione sociale dell’innovazione, Torino: Celid.

Comune di Terni, Documento Unico di Programmazione (DUP) (https://www.comune.terni.it/system/files/documenti/2025_dup_2025_2027_emendato_unito_oopp_1736869947%20%281%29.pdf).

De Giorgi F. e Lupo A. (2022). Governare l’incertezza. Percorsi di innovazione sociale per nuovi partenariati pubblico-privato, Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Du Pisani J. A. (2006). Sustainable development – historical roots of the concept, Environmental Sciences, 3 (2), pp. 83-96.

https://doi.org/10.1080/15693430600688831.

Farnsworth K. (2013). Bringing Corporate Welfare In, Journal of Social Policy, 42

(1), pp. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279412000761.

Fox C. e Albertson K. (2011). Payment by Results and Social Impact Bonds in the Criminal Justice Sector: New Challenges for the Concept of Evidence-Based Policy?, Criminology & Criminal Justice, 11 (5), pp. 395-413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895811415580.

Fox C. e Albertson K. (2012). Is Payment by Results the Most Efficient Way to Address the Challenges Faced by the Criminal Justice Sector?, Probation Journal, 59 (4), pp. 355-373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550512458473.

Fraser A., Tan S., Lagarde M. e Mays N. (2018). Narratives of promise, narratives of caution: A review of the literature on Social Impact Bonds, Social Policy & Administration, 52 (1), pp. 4-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12260.

Galluccio C. (2023). Social Impact Bonds and Social Innovation: Benefits and Weaknesses, Advances in Applied Sociology, 13 (6), pp. 488-495. 10.4236/aasoci.2023.136030.

Greco P. (a cura di). (2002). Lo sviluppo sostenibile. Dalla Conferenza di Rio alla Conferenza di Johannesburg, Napoli: CUEN.

Hevenstone D., Fraser A., Hobi L., Przepiorka W. e Geuke G. G. M. (2023). The impact of social impact bond financing, Public Administration Review, 83 (4), pp. 930-946. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13631.

Joy M. e Shields J. (2013). Social Impact Bonds: The Next Phase of Third Sector Marketization?, Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 4 (2), pp. 39-55. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjnser.2013v4n2a148.

Leventhal R. (2012). Effecting Progress: Using Social Impact Bonds to Finance Social Services. New York University Journal of Law & Business, 9, pp. 511-534.

McHugh N., Sinclair S., Roy M., Huckfield L. e Donaldson C. (2013). Social impact bonds: a wolf in sheep’s clothing?, Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 21 (3), pp. 247-257. https://doi.org/10.1332/204674313X13812372137921.

Meadows D. H., Meadows D. L., Randers J. e Behrens, W. W. III. (1972). The limits to growth, New York: Universe Books.

Minutolo A. (a cura di) (2025). Mal’Aria di città: Luci e ombre dell’inquinamento atmosferico nelle città italiane, Legambiente. (https://www.legambiente.it/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/MalAria-

2025.pdf).

Mio C. (2021). L’azienda sostenibile, Bari-Roma: Editori Laterza.

Montanari F., Sgaragli F. e Teloni D. (2017). Le dimensioni dell’innovazione sociale per il design e l’implementazione di politiche pubbliche efficaci, Impresa Sociale, 10. 10.7425/IS.2017.10.06.

Murray R., Caulier-Grice J., Mulgan G. (2010). The Open Book of Social Innovation, Nesta: The Young Foundation.

Nazioni Unite (2015). Trasformare il nostro mondo: L’Agenda 2030 per lo sviluppo sostenibile. (https://unric.org/it/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2019/11/Agenda-2030-Onu-italia.pdf).

Olson H., Painter G., Albertson K., Fox C. e O’Leary C. (2024). Are social impact bonds an innovation in finance or do they help finance social innovation?, Journal of Social Policy, 53 (2), pp. 407-431. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279422000356.

Pasi G. (2014). Challenges for European Welfare Systems. A Research Agenda on Social Impact Bonds, Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, 8 (2), pp. 141-150.

Phills Jr. J. A., Deiglmeier K. e Miller D. T. (2008). Rediscovering Social Innovation, Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6 (4), pp. 34-43. https://doi.org/10.48558/GBJY-GJ47

Portelli A. (2017). La città dell'acciaio. Due secoli di storia operaia, Roma: Donzelli.

Ramella F. (2013). Sociologia dell'innovazione economica, Bologna: Il Mulino.

Redclift M. (1987). Sustainable development: Exploring the contradictions, London: Routledge.

Id. (2005). Sustainable development (1987–2005): an oxymoron comes of age, Sustainable Development, 13 (4), pp. 212-227. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.281.

Rizzello A. e Carè R. (2016). Insight into the social impact bond market: An analysis of investors, ACRN Oxford Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives, 5 (3), pp. 145-171.

Ruggerio C. A. (2021). Sustainability and sustainable development: A review of principles and definitions, Science of the Total Environment, 786, p. 147481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147481.

Schinckus C. (2017). Financial innovation as a potential force for a positive social change: The challenging future of social impact bonds, Research in International Business and Finance, 39 (B), pp. 727-736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2015.11.004.

Seefried E. (2015). Rethinking Progress. On the Origin of the Modern Sustainability Discourse, 1970–2000, Journal of Modern European History, 13 (3), pp. 377-400. https://doi.org/10.17104/1611-8944-2015-3-377.

Skelcher C. e Smith S. R. (2017). New development: Performance promises and pitfalls in hybrid organizations—five challenges for managers and researchers, Public Money & Management, 37 (6), pp. 425-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2017.1344023.

World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our common future. (https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987ourcommon-future.pdf).

Yamada S., Kanoi L., Koh V., Lim A. e Dove M. R. (2022). Sustainability as a moral discourse: Its shifting meanings, exclusions, and anxieties, Sustainability, 14 (5), p. 3095. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14053095.

Downloads

Pubblicato

2025-10-29